Read How to Be an (A)theist: Why Many Skeptics Aren't Skeptical Enough Online Free - Atheists talk a lot about the importance of skepticism. But the truth is, they're not nearly skeptical enough.
While they champion the importance of a critical stance toward religion, they often fail to take that same stance toward their own beliefs. This double standard results in grandiose claims about the certainty of unbelief. However, their confidence in the rational strength of their own position is logically inconsistent at best and intellectually dishonest at worst. Turning atheists' skepticism around on their own naturalist worldview, philosopher Mitch Stokes critically examines two things that such skeptics hold dear—science and morality—revealing deep inconsistencies among atheists' most cherished beliefs, inconsistencies that threaten to undo atheism itself.
|Title||:||How to Be an (A)theist: Why Many Skeptics Aren't Skeptical Enough|
|Number of Pages||:||256 pages|
February 25, 2016
Mitch's goal in this book is to show Atheists, sceptics are not consistent or skeptical enough, I think he has given a good base for it.
Personally, I think Atheists are good people, some are really loving but I am not interested in that, but more on the system of beliefs when challenged.
If you a...
May 13, 2017
This book had so much promise, but in the end it was only OK.
The author addresses two hot button issues in Christian apologetics (science and morality). He strikes me as a sophisticated philosopher (good), and he tries to simplify his arguments so that any layperson can understand them (good). Ho...
January 02, 2017
This book requires thinking work, but is unrelenting to the point and interspersed with Calvin and Hobbes cartoons. I enjoyed thinking about brains in vats and how philosophy is inescapable to science, and more science-people should acknowledge it.
October 04, 2017
An excellent book. Objectively.
February 28, 2017
Good book for the topic it covers. Not an all-encompassing apologetic but it does handle very well the topic it addresses: the hypocrisy of modern skepticism and the failure of naturalists to follow their logic through fully. He addresses how skeptics have chosen to be skeptical over the areas th...
February 23, 2016
The title of this book is not very helpful, but the subtitle does a good job of getting at the book's theme. The text is more or less divided into half. The first half addresses cosmology and other aspects of physics, questioning whether advances in these fields have truly precluded theism, as ma...
February 20, 2016
How to Be an Atheist challenges readers to come to terms with the ramifications of new atheism beliefs. Exposing the silliness of scientists arguing that philosophy serves no purpose while engage in writing philosophic tomes. Not seeing the elephant in the room that a lifeless universe's cannot d...
June 02, 2016
Great depth into a different worldview
I thank Mitch Stokes for writing this book. It is a tough read in that it digs deep into lots of philosophical and scientific theories (and the definition of what a theory really is), which is not a typical topic for me. However, Stokes does a great job remin...
August 06, 2016
While the logical implications of naturalism on morality and reasoning seem obvious, there are significant philosophical issues involved in this question. Stokes deals with the historical philosophical heavyweights on the issues of knowledge, reason, morality and spiritual dualism. Stokes shows t...
May 06, 2016
An absolute must read. In this volume, Mitch Stokes, examines issue after issue where atheistic naturalism fails as a coherent worldview.